Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 20 of 22

Thread: No more manual transmissions in a Duramax - why?

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Absarokee, Montana
    Posts
    8

    Default No more manual transmissions in a Duramax - why?

    I currently own a Chevy Silverado Duramax HD 4x4, with a 6 speed manual transmission. Yet I am disappointed to discover the new 08 Duramax Diesels that GM is offering, you cannot order one with a manual transmission.

    I know there are fans of the Allison transmission out there, but I am a die hard manual transmission guy; all the vehicles I have ever owned had a manual transmission.

    If GM does not offer another Duramax Diesel with a manual transmission, I may be owning a Dodge Ram 2500 powered by a Cummins Diesel with a 6 speed manual transmission.

    Are there any thoughts as to what is going on at GM that would warrant their offering of the Allison transmission only and not having any manual transmission option available? Inquiring minds want to know.

    RKL

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    NJ
    Posts
    157

    Default

    the Cummins is a good choice, but im still not sure about the new ones, the 5.9Ls are known to be the million mile motor, this new one im not sold on yet. at least its not a mercedes, those cars, no manuals offered at all
    95 GMC Sierra 2500 4x4 6.5L turbo ext cab 6ft bed ( relocated NEW PMD with cooler, running so far so good) SOLD SOLD SOLD

    95 Chevy Silverado 1500 4x4 Z71 stepside 350V8

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    Surrey, BC
    Posts
    282

    Default

    I'm with you on this one. I specifically searched out a manual, and it was no easy task given their scarcity, so I guess therein lies the answer: people didn't buy them in sufficient numbers to warrant their production.

    The reason I prefer a manual is that I feel I have way better control than driving an auto, and I only use the brakes to come to a stop. Having said that, I would welcome the opportunity to try the 6-spd Allison with the gear select (arrow up or down) on the gear-shift arm. That way I could hold it where I wanted on grades and still have the ease of auto in town.
    Brett
    2005 GMC Sierra SLT Dually Crew, 4x4, stock
    71,000 kms

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Ardrossan, Alberta
    Posts
    53

    Default

    My new service rig had an allison with the "manual" transmission option, and while I always drove the truck that way, it still didn't work like a real manual does.

    I personally won't be buying a new GMC becuase of that very reason. I'm not sold on the new Cummins either, so I may wind up behind the wheel of a new Powerstroke / 6 speed instead. I have a buddy who bought a brand new 6.7L cummins, and claims that it goes like crazy, but gets absolutely terrible mileage.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Jan 2001
    Location
    New Hampshire - Live Free or Die
    Posts
    6,057

    Default

    My guess as to why:

    Two reasons.

    First, I doubt if they sold enough manuals to warrant the costs involved in developing and certifying the emissions to make it profitable.

    Second, I expect emissions certification is a lot more difficult with the manual. With the automatic they can simply program out conditions that result in excessive emissions.

    Remember, too, the manual D-max is derated compared to the automatic, so there must also be some durabuility issues.
    The Constitution needs to be re-read, not re-written!

    If you can't handle Dr. Seuss, how will you handle real life?

    Current oil burners: MB GLK250 BlueTEC, John Deere X758
    New ride: MB GLS450 - most stately
    Gone but not forgotten: '87 F350 7.3, '93 C2500 6.5, '95 K2500 6.5, '06 K2500HD 6.6, '90 MB 350SDL, Kubota 7510

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Alberta, Canada
    Posts
    311

    Default

    Russell i think all the new diesels have terrible fuel mileage.....doesn't that come with the high HP numbers?

    aside from that, i think they like selling the automatic transmission trucks because they charge more. When i was pricing out my truck, i recall i could have gotten the 6 speed manual, but i was firmly told that it was damn near guaranteed to not last as long as the allison (when driven under normal conditions).......and of course 300 hp instead of 360. But i also remember the extra cash of around $3xxx for the allison transmission option.

    i could have put up with the 60 less horsepower, but it was the fact that i was trusting the guys at the dealer when they told me the allison will outlast the manual.

    i guess time will tell, and i settled for the auto anyways and have no real complaints other than leaky cooling lines.....but i would still rather enjoy driving a new diesel with a 6 speed manual. I won't settle for ford, and dodge hasn't won me over just yet
    2011 VW Jetta TDI, pretty well loaded without leather.
    2006 GMC Sierra D-max, 4x4, 4 door, bumper, winch, Espar heater, and the HID lights are a nice touch too.....
    1986 GMC 3500, 454 on propane, 4 speed, 4x4, crew cab dually......the welding truck
    1984 Toyota 4x4 pickup, 4.3 V6, 700R4, Toyota t-case.......transforming into 4x4 cage buggy

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    Skippack PA
    Posts
    25

    Default

    The duramax has soo much torque it was wrecking the manuals.
    I do not drive for a living but towing my boat thru the PA mts. and my dump trailer using the '06 allison in manual mode is fantastic. I almost never have to touch the brakes. When I fish the NJ shore I end up coming up thru the Blue Rt or "SureKill " expresss way towing my Whaler.Tough roads as most of the way is only 2 lanes. Just push the tow haul mode button and I 'am not getting cut in front and can deal w/ the short stops/fast start ups that come w/ an outdated highway.
    I drive stick, learned @ 11 yrs in F350 SA wrecker ,driven many since, but I feel the Allison is overall a better choice then a stick.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Austin, TX
    Posts
    56

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Bravo Whiskey 21 View Post
    The duramax has soo much torque it was wrecking the manuals.
    I do not drive for a living but towing my boat thru the PA mts. and my dump trailer using the '06 allison in manual mode is fantastic. I almost never have to touch the brakes. When I fish the NJ shore I end up coming up thru the Blue Rt or "SureKill " expresss way towing my Whaler.Tough roads as most of the way is only 2 lanes. Just push the tow haul mode button and I 'am not getting cut in front and can deal w/ the short stops/fast start ups that come w/ an outdated highway.
    I drive stick, learned @ 11 yrs in F350 SA wrecker ,driven many since, but I feel the Allison is overall a better choice then a stick.
    I’ll have to agree. Many years ago, I gave up on ‘disposable’ automatic transmissions and drove hand-shakers for 16 years. The Allison has changed my mind, all of the benefits of control from the manual and no sore knee from driving in heavy traffic. The best part is…no more clutch jobs every 80k miles.

    Incidentally, the most recent demographics show less than 15% of the population can even drive a stick much less own one. I believe the popularity of the manual in the Fjords and Goats has been due to the crappy Auto that was available in the past. Now that Fjord has the Torque-Shift and the Goat has the Aisin, things will probably change on those too.
    2005 Chev Duramax/Allison 3500LS DRW Crew Cab, Ride-Rites, Sulastics
    B&W 30K-Turnover GN, Putnam 15K-Class-5, A/T Revos, LMM mouthpiece

    2006 Chev 6.0L/4L80e 3500WT DRW Ex-Cab 8'Flat-GN, Ride-Rites, Sulastics
    A/T Revos

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Apr 2002
    Location
    PA
    Posts
    302

    Default

    GM insists on using a dual-mass flywheel in front of the manual tranny to keep the chatter down. Doing so creates the reliability issue. GM can't make a durable flywheel in this manner. The aftermarket provides excellent solutions to this problem, though. Want a solid flywheel? Okay. Want a double-disc clutch setup? You can have that, too, behind a Duramax.

    A ZF-6 truck with 300 HP is still going to put down numbers very similar to a 360 HP Allison truck at the rear wheels. The automatic has greater parasitic loss.

    Of course GM is going to sell fewer manuals if the people assume they aren't out there to be had. And people will only search for so long before they get fed up and settle for something they didn't really want. Or they shed their brand loyalty and move on to another company who will give these people what they really want. Like manual transmissions and solid front axles...
    1994 K1500 Blazer: 6.5L TD/4L80E: 'F' intake: Kennedy chip: Kennedy 3.5" exhaust: Heath Turbo-Master: 2/0 battery cables: Lubrication Specialist oil cooler lines: Fumoto drain valve: Amsoil dual bypass remote oil filter kit: Fluidampr: 137k miles

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Alberta, Canada
    Posts
    311

    Default

    if they made the transmissions with many gears and close gear ratios so i could shift like a big rig then i wouldn't mind driving a manual pickup in the city........but since they don't make them like that, i have to admit that the auto sure makes life easier on my left leg.
    2011 VW Jetta TDI, pretty well loaded without leather.
    2006 GMC Sierra D-max, 4x4, 4 door, bumper, winch, Espar heater, and the HID lights are a nice touch too.....
    1986 GMC 3500, 454 on propane, 4 speed, 4x4, crew cab dually......the welding truck
    1984 Toyota 4x4 pickup, 4.3 V6, 700R4, Toyota t-case.......transforming into 4x4 cage buggy

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Jax Florida
    Posts
    415

    Default

    from what I have seen most of the diesels are easily shifted by engine RPM no clutch needed. However I have never driven a duramax so its possible that it will not work that way.
    93 GMC Sierra 2500
    6.5L TD 5 spd Manual trans Sold

    97 Chevy Silverado CrewCab K3500 Dually
    6.5L TD Auto


  12. #12
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    NJ
    Posts
    157

    Default

    i have to admit, i was searching for a manual truck with the 6.5L when i was looking, and i settled for the auto. sold that, looked for a manual with a 5.0L or 5.7, settled for the auto again. hard to find the 5 speed trucks. but its not so bad being able to just push a pedal to stop and go. i guess my other 5 vehicles that are 5 spd will have to do
    95 GMC Sierra 2500 4x4 6.5L turbo ext cab 6ft bed ( relocated NEW PMD with cooler, running so far so good) SOLD SOLD SOLD

    95 Chevy Silverado 1500 4x4 Z71 stepside 350V8

  13. #13
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Location
    SC
    Posts
    939

    Default

    I agree mainly 3 reasons.
    1. Emissions
    2. Clutch (GM just fails miserably at this from clutch pedal assembly squeak to flywheel and disc hub etc).
    3. Perception and Market.

    3. GM has literally STUNK at clutches since well I am not sure they ever made a nice clutch. So most GM loyalists have given up and converted to Auto's

    In comparison Ford and Dodge seem better easier clutch pedal pressure and smooth quiet motion. Yeah they all tear up if you up HP and push the limits but Manuals with good clutches can be mated to high HP. Auto will still take a bit more if also built in the light trucks but again GM could do so much better....

    I am hoping they will eventually try again but in 10 more yrs a manual will be a collectable.
    97 5spd K2500 Ext Cab short Bed ~160K miles.
    TM, 3" downpipe & 4" exhaust, remote FSD, remote oilfilter, Gauges: EGT, Boost, Fuel Pressure, B&W Gooseneck Turnover ball, Prodigy Brake Controller. Hi-Temp Hydraulic Oil Cooler Lines.

  14. #14
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Jax Florida
    Posts
    415

    Default

    I have to agree on the clutch pedal pressure, I have the 93 nv4500 and my brother has a dodge with the nv4500 and his clutch is so easy to press.
    Last edited by 93GMCSierra; 03-02-2008 at 11:45. Reason: typo
    93 GMC Sierra 2500
    6.5L TD 5 spd Manual trans Sold

    97 Chevy Silverado CrewCab K3500 Dually
    6.5L TD Auto


  15. #15
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Location
    SC
    Posts
    939

    Default

    YEP, GM claims there is no market but Ford and Dodge easily seem to sell more manuals. Yes the numbers are dropping across all brands but GM accelerated thier numbers all on thier own and shame on them for that. When a GM salesman says its the market I feel like cussing him out.
    97 5spd K2500 Ext Cab short Bed ~160K miles.
    TM, 3" downpipe & 4" exhaust, remote FSD, remote oilfilter, Gauges: EGT, Boost, Fuel Pressure, B&W Gooseneck Turnover ball, Prodigy Brake Controller. Hi-Temp Hydraulic Oil Cooler Lines.

  16. #16
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    Skippack PA
    Posts
    25

    Default

    Come on guys, it is hard enough dialing the cell phone, changing the CD, playing w/the GPS, & shoving the Big Mac in my face and have to worry about shifting.

  17. #17

    Default

    Hello, I am new to the forums. Not that new to diesels though. Apparently a local GMC Freightliner dealership told me that alot of Dmax's were tearing up the 6 spds. He also added the cost for redesigning a stronger unit and a less of a profit margin compared to the mark up on the Allison.
    08' 3500 Silverado Crew Cab LMM
    03' 2500 Express 6. sl0w Litre
    02' Stolen Silverado 3500 Crew Cab LB7 (Pictured)
    94' GMC 1500 355 Blower Motor 12.29 108 mph
    93' S-10 4.3L 289,350 miles.
    80' Malibu

  18. #18
    Join Date
    Apr 2001
    Location
    Midland, Tx USA
    Posts
    236

    Default Miss mine

    I think you hit the nail on the head. Cost is the main reason for anything they do. Nowadays I really miss my ol '93 6.5 with the nv4500. Yea it was in the shop every 4 to 6 months for pumps (lift and injection) but I would gladly tolerate that for my 17 in town and 21 to 24 on the hwy mileage. Traded it for a 454 auto (couldn't find another standard) very reliable still got it at 203k but at a price 11 in town and 14 on the hwy both empty. Yip, I have a shouldu' had a v8 moment every time I fill up.....Hmm wonder where my ol' truck is today?

  19. #19
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Location
    SC
    Posts
    939

    Default

    I am not buying that the Duramax was tearing up many ZF's in 3/4 and 1 tons or bigger isn't it rated for up to close to 26000 lb gcvwr? Probably lots of clutch related failures though. GM doesn't make the ZF and didn't make the NV4500 either so petuie on cost of development. Funny how Southbend and a couple other manufacturers can develop a better clutch and has less money than GM too.

    The 5.9 Cummins gave the NV4500 5th gear and factory clutch a trial by fire and its a bit underrated for heavy towing but after they fixed 5th and put a better clutch with it its a pretty good tranny. Yeah, you get crazy snatching around a strong engine and a big trucks something has to give.

    Good point I agree more profit in selling auto's especially if you can streamline production lines and don't worry about manual options and having to credit back on sticker is really big.

    I do wonder about GM's grand picture of uniform bellhousing size and interchangeability across gasser trucks 3/4 ton through 2 tons. I think this time it really limited them in clutch disc size options and if thats what has always hampered them so. Especially in a platform engine like the 6.6 that can go in bigger trucks too. But dang I kind of question if they were giving $3000 back for manual trans vs Allison why they couldn't have come off the coin for a better clutch and still given some money back. Must have been Ford and Dodge manual truck price just beat GM's too much but I don't know never compared apples to apples. Plus Ford and Dodge's automatics were thier Achilles heel another reason they sell more manuals.
    97 5spd K2500 Ext Cab short Bed ~160K miles.
    TM, 3" downpipe & 4" exhaust, remote FSD, remote oilfilter, Gauges: EGT, Boost, Fuel Pressure, B&W Gooseneck Turnover ball, Prodigy Brake Controller. Hi-Temp Hydraulic Oil Cooler Lines.

  20. #20
    Join Date
    Dec 2001
    Location
    Yorba Linda, California
    Posts
    496

    Default

    I don't recall reading anywhere on the forums about the manual transmission itself being tore up by the Duramax engine. I believe it was the clutch. The reliability of the manual trans clutch was terrible relative to the Allison transmission.
    '02 Chev 2500HD EC/SB 4x4 D/A

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •