Results 1 to 20 of 22

Thread: No more manual transmissions in a Duramax - why?

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    Skippack PA
    Posts
    25

    Default

    The duramax has soo much torque it was wrecking the manuals.
    I do not drive for a living but towing my boat thru the PA mts. and my dump trailer using the '06 allison in manual mode is fantastic. I almost never have to touch the brakes. When I fish the NJ shore I end up coming up thru the Blue Rt or "SureKill " expresss way towing my Whaler.Tough roads as most of the way is only 2 lanes. Just push the tow haul mode button and I 'am not getting cut in front and can deal w/ the short stops/fast start ups that come w/ an outdated highway.
    I drive stick, learned @ 11 yrs in F350 SA wrecker ,driven many since, but I feel the Allison is overall a better choice then a stick.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Austin, TX
    Posts
    56

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Bravo Whiskey 21 View Post
    The duramax has soo much torque it was wrecking the manuals.
    I do not drive for a living but towing my boat thru the PA mts. and my dump trailer using the '06 allison in manual mode is fantastic. I almost never have to touch the brakes. When I fish the NJ shore I end up coming up thru the Blue Rt or "SureKill " expresss way towing my Whaler.Tough roads as most of the way is only 2 lanes. Just push the tow haul mode button and I 'am not getting cut in front and can deal w/ the short stops/fast start ups that come w/ an outdated highway.
    I drive stick, learned @ 11 yrs in F350 SA wrecker ,driven many since, but I feel the Allison is overall a better choice then a stick.
    I’ll have to agree. Many years ago, I gave up on ‘disposable’ automatic transmissions and drove hand-shakers for 16 years. The Allison has changed my mind, all of the benefits of control from the manual and no sore knee from driving in heavy traffic. The best part is…no more clutch jobs every 80k miles.

    Incidentally, the most recent demographics show less than 15% of the population can even drive a stick much less own one. I believe the popularity of the manual in the Fjords and Goats has been due to the crappy Auto that was available in the past. Now that Fjord has the Torque-Shift and the Goat has the Aisin, things will probably change on those too.
    2005 Chev Duramax/Allison 3500LS DRW Crew Cab, Ride-Rites, Sulastics
    B&W 30K-Turnover GN, Putnam 15K-Class-5, A/T Revos, LMM mouthpiece

    2006 Chev 6.0L/4L80e 3500WT DRW Ex-Cab 8'Flat-GN, Ride-Rites, Sulastics
    A/T Revos

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Apr 2002
    Location
    PA
    Posts
    302

    Default

    GM insists on using a dual-mass flywheel in front of the manual tranny to keep the chatter down. Doing so creates the reliability issue. GM can't make a durable flywheel in this manner. The aftermarket provides excellent solutions to this problem, though. Want a solid flywheel? Okay. Want a double-disc clutch setup? You can have that, too, behind a Duramax.

    A ZF-6 truck with 300 HP is still going to put down numbers very similar to a 360 HP Allison truck at the rear wheels. The automatic has greater parasitic loss.

    Of course GM is going to sell fewer manuals if the people assume they aren't out there to be had. And people will only search for so long before they get fed up and settle for something they didn't really want. Or they shed their brand loyalty and move on to another company who will give these people what they really want. Like manual transmissions and solid front axles...
    1994 K1500 Blazer: 6.5L TD/4L80E: 'F' intake: Kennedy chip: Kennedy 3.5" exhaust: Heath Turbo-Master: 2/0 battery cables: Lubrication Specialist oil cooler lines: Fumoto drain valve: Amsoil dual bypass remote oil filter kit: Fluidampr: 137k miles

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Alberta, Canada
    Posts
    311

    Default

    if they made the transmissions with many gears and close gear ratios so i could shift like a big rig then i wouldn't mind driving a manual pickup in the city........but since they don't make them like that, i have to admit that the auto sure makes life easier on my left leg.
    2011 VW Jetta TDI, pretty well loaded without leather.
    2006 GMC Sierra D-max, 4x4, 4 door, bumper, winch, Espar heater, and the HID lights are a nice touch too.....
    1986 GMC 3500, 454 on propane, 4 speed, 4x4, crew cab dually......the welding truck
    1984 Toyota 4x4 pickup, 4.3 V6, 700R4, Toyota t-case.......transforming into 4x4 cage buggy

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Jax Florida
    Posts
    415

    Default

    from what I have seen most of the diesels are easily shifted by engine RPM no clutch needed. However I have never driven a duramax so its possible that it will not work that way.
    93 GMC Sierra 2500
    6.5L TD 5 spd Manual trans Sold

    97 Chevy Silverado CrewCab K3500 Dually
    6.5L TD Auto


  6. #6
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    NJ
    Posts
    157

    Default

    i have to admit, i was searching for a manual truck with the 6.5L when i was looking, and i settled for the auto. sold that, looked for a manual with a 5.0L or 5.7, settled for the auto again. hard to find the 5 speed trucks. but its not so bad being able to just push a pedal to stop and go. i guess my other 5 vehicles that are 5 spd will have to do
    95 GMC Sierra 2500 4x4 6.5L turbo ext cab 6ft bed ( relocated NEW PMD with cooler, running so far so good) SOLD SOLD SOLD

    95 Chevy Silverado 1500 4x4 Z71 stepside 350V8

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Location
    SC
    Posts
    939

    Default

    I agree mainly 3 reasons.
    1. Emissions
    2. Clutch (GM just fails miserably at this from clutch pedal assembly squeak to flywheel and disc hub etc).
    3. Perception and Market.

    3. GM has literally STUNK at clutches since well I am not sure they ever made a nice clutch. So most GM loyalists have given up and converted to Auto's

    In comparison Ford and Dodge seem better easier clutch pedal pressure and smooth quiet motion. Yeah they all tear up if you up HP and push the limits but Manuals with good clutches can be mated to high HP. Auto will still take a bit more if also built in the light trucks but again GM could do so much better....

    I am hoping they will eventually try again but in 10 more yrs a manual will be a collectable.
    97 5spd K2500 Ext Cab short Bed ~160K miles.
    TM, 3" downpipe & 4" exhaust, remote FSD, remote oilfilter, Gauges: EGT, Boost, Fuel Pressure, B&W Gooseneck Turnover ball, Prodigy Brake Controller. Hi-Temp Hydraulic Oil Cooler Lines.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Jax Florida
    Posts
    415

    Default

    I have to agree on the clutch pedal pressure, I have the 93 nv4500 and my brother has a dodge with the nv4500 and his clutch is so easy to press.
    Last edited by 93GMCSierra; 03-02-2008 at 11:45. Reason: typo
    93 GMC Sierra 2500
    6.5L TD 5 spd Manual trans Sold

    97 Chevy Silverado CrewCab K3500 Dually
    6.5L TD Auto


  9. #9
    Join Date
    Oct 2001
    Location
    Myrtlehead, TX
    Posts
    414

    Default ZF 6 Forever

    My six speed has 300,000 on it and never been worked on. The dual mass flywheel is another story. I went through many till I found a single piece at South Bend Clutch.

    I just replaced my transfer case (again) and Mr Good Wrench pulled the 6 speed to look for other trouble, and with 30,000 on this new single piece flywheel the surfaces looked new. the machine grooved was still there. Gotta love it!

    Mike

    PS I do get leg cramps in city trafic.
    2002 GMC, Pretty Dark Blue, 4x4 / 3500, ZF6, 115 gal spare tank and Rockets... (My Other One): Flying Fuel. I got three engines and a 52,000 gallon tank, how many you got?

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Feb 2000
    Location
    Montana
    Posts
    11,416

    Default

    The 6-speed manual GM used in the 2500HD/3500 diesel pickups was identified as a "ZF S6-650". The "S6" identifies this as a 6-speed. The "650" identifies the input torque limit.

    As has been mentioned here, the originally introduced flywheel was a problem. An updated flywheel was released in July 2004 that was designed to increase life, improve friction control and reduce transmission input shaft wear.

    Here's a clip from an article I wrote in 2004:

    The ZF S6-650 six-speed manual transmission first became available in GM's 8.1L & Duramax equipped 2500HD/3500 series pickup trucks beginning in the 2001 model-year. Lower cost, improved fuel economy and a performance advantage in certain situations are among the more important reasons owners express when selecting the ZF six-speed. The S6-650 is also available on C4500 & 5500 medium duty trucks.

    ZF S6-650 Key Features:
    • Designed specifically for high torque pickup trucks.
    • Synchronized in all gears.
    • Dual-cone synchronizer in 2nd and 3rd gears.
    • High helix angle gearsets provide high contact ratio and quiet operation.
    • Lower shift forces w/ tight shift pattern.
    • Lightweight integrated aluminum housing
      (front, center & rear).
    • Center bearing support for improved durability.
    • Reverse & 1st gear location improve maneuvering ease.
    • Overdrive 6th gear shift lever position located forward and away for improved passenger comfort.
    • Gross Combined Vehicle Weight Rating up to 26,000-lbs.
    • Left & right ISO/SAE 6-bolt Power Take-Off ports.
    Jim

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •