Results 1 to 5 of 5

Thread: Semi-Floating vs. Full-floating

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    St. Albans, WV
    Posts
    368

    Default Semi-Floating vs. Full-floating

    Is there much benefit of a full-floating axle over the semi-floating?

    I have the 10" full-floater in my Suburban. I have a 10" semi-floater, from a newer truck, here in my garage. The semi-floater has disk brakes, which I'd like to have on my Suburban.

    Would it be much of a downgrade if I swap the full-floater for the semi-floater?

    I know that the full-floaters are easier to work on, but is there much more benefit to them?
    96 Suburban K2500 6.5L TD. High miles and daily driven (for now). Remote mount FSD with cooler, Turbo Master/Boost fooler, 4" Jardine turbo back exhaust, 2.5" cross-over pipe, Boost, EGT, & Tranny temp gauges, working on more.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Mar 2000
    Location
    South Central Pennsylvania, USA
    Posts
    2,697

    Default

    Technically, the full-floater is stronger as the axle shafts are only dealing with the torque and not the vehicle weight.

    But how much stronger it is in your application is a question.

    Also, there are companies that make setups to adapt the disc brakes to the full-float axle.
    '94 GMC 6.5TD K1500 4L80E 2-Door Yukon SLE 221K
    '93 Chevrolet 6.5TD K2500HD NV4500 Std. Cab Longbed 187K
    '85 Toyota 22R RN60 4x4 Std. Cab Shortbed 178K (Currently retired for rebuild)
    Diesel Page Member #2423

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Feb 2000
    Location
    Montana
    Posts
    11,398

    Default

    The 14-bolt semi-floating axle contains a 9.5" ring gear, while the 14-bolt FF has a 10.5" ring gear.

    Over time, the SF was available with 3 different axle tubing diameters and/or wall thicknesses, 3.0" axle tubing diameter with a 4,800-lb weight rating, 3.34" diameter (.238" wall) with a 5,700-lb rating, and 3.34" (.260" wall) with a 6,000-lb rating.

    The 9.5" FF has a 4,993-lb-ft axle output torque rating.

    The 10.5" FF was available with a 3.48" axle tubing diameter and a wall thickness of either .215" or .492". This produced an axle weight rating of 5,700-lb or 8,600-lb.

    The 10.5" FF has a 6,242-lb-ft axle output torque rating.

    All that said, a lot of Suburbans and 3/4-ton pickups have been built with the 9.5" SF through the years.

    Jim

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    Sweden
    Posts
    169

    Default

    Not all 10.5" FF are 3,5" there is 3 3/8" tubed aswell, it all depends on the application
    The 9.5" SF was also available in 3 3/8" tubing

    http://www.pirate4x4.com/tech/billav...ble/index.html

    also some info on brakes

    http://www.pirate4x4.com/tech/billavista/Brakes/
    1991 CK2500, 6.2 banks turbo, FourtGear built TH700R4, Dick Cepek 6.5" lift, 35" wheels

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    St. Albans, WV
    Posts
    368

    Default

    Thanks for the info guys!

    Apparently all the disc brakes kits are for the older axles, where you have to pull the studs to remove the drum. At least that's all I have been able to find.
    96 Suburban K2500 6.5L TD. High miles and daily driven (for now). Remote mount FSD with cooler, Turbo Master/Boost fooler, 4" Jardine turbo back exhaust, 2.5" cross-over pipe, Boost, EGT, & Tranny temp gauges, working on more.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •