I guess the point I was trying to make,without so many words, was the same things that Mr. Morrison put into words so eloquently.
I won't say that MT-10 doesn't work. But because of it's chemistry, you don't know how it will react with the additive package in your oil. You'd have to have the chemical make up of MT-10 and the additive package make up of the type of oil you are using. Both of which I would think are proprietary. So adding stuff like this to your oil adds a huge unknown to the performance of your oil.
If MT-10 polarizes metal, then it should polarize your oil. This seems bad to me because if the metals are like charged, then parts of the oil would be the same. So only certain components of the oil would be able to do the job they were intended.
Now, I'm not a chemical engineer, lube engineer, or ME. But I know a little about each of these things to know that I don't want to risk my engine for experimentation. Actually, I'd be risking the wife's engine for that. You married guys should know what I mean.
\'99 2500 ISB QC SLT (No Leather!),4x4,5sp w/McLeod,4:10,BP8x11\'s,B-1,FMS,EZ,PE4200,LPG,H2O/CH4O,4\"exh.,Pac-Brake,OBA,more switches than you,Line-X,V-1,lts,siren,lic. plt. frm says \"<b><i>Diesel Fumes Make Me Horny!</i></b>\",and much more goofy stuff.