Results 1 to 5 of 5

Thread: GM outlines fuel additve usage....

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Oct 2001
    Location
    Boothwyn, Pa. USA
    Posts
    2,871

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Mar 2002
    Location
    Greenland, NH USA
    Posts
    70

    Thumbs up

    Thanks Hoot,

    Guess GM is understanding that we don't live in a perfect lab quality fuel world. [img]tongue.gif[/img]

    Did you also see the Tech-2 info release? Does this lend fact to the ablity of the supposed new "Tech-3" to scan and detect piggy back boxes? The debate continues.......
    2002 Chassis cab 3500 D/A 4X4 Onynx Black Ext.Cab<br />2000 Chassis cab 3500 6.5 4X4 Pueter <br />1986 Chassis cab K-30 6.2 4X4 Cherry Red

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Nov 2001
    Location
    Auburn, WA USA
    Posts
    48

    Post

    GM obviously does not want to acknowledge what George Morrison has been telling us all along that its better to lockup the water and send it throuhg the system rather than rely on the filter unit catching the free water. George always sounds like he has real data backing up his conclusions.
    2002 2500HD 4x4 Ext Cab Sht Box Duramax
    DTA Boards
    Linex w/Retrax Cover
    Mag Hytek Diff Cover
    Lucerix Mirrors
    Husky Flaps
    JPCustoms Homelink
    Hijacker Double Pivot 5th Wheel Slider Hitch
    2001 Komfort 27FSG w/Slide

  4. #4
    oyazi Guest

    Post

    But isn't that what alcohol does?

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Jul 2002
    Location
    Webster, NY
    Posts
    43

    Post

    It sounds like the Rotella additive is OK for a Duramax.
    Chevy 2002 D/A, SLT, EXCAB LONG BOX, 2500HD, 4X4, Rhino Liner <br />PULLS A 36FT. 12,500# DOUBLE TREE MOBIL SUITES TRIPLE SLIDE FIFTH WHEEL, SHARES GARAGE SPACE WITH A 36 FORD COUPE(350 POWERED)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •