Results 1 to 16 of 16

Thread: Soot trap or cat?

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    Kelowna, BC
    Posts
    1,070

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by rameye View Post
    Good for you!

    Here in the great communist state of Ct. if a cat/soot trap was original equipment, you'd better have one for inspection!

    Enjoy your much enhanced performance..
    i read that in CA they are going to be requiring a DPF setup. Is that true? If so, I think a rebellion is in line.....
    1993 HD2500- 4X4, Nv4500, rc/lb, Lots of mods, killed her. Awaiting her TT rebuild!

    2002 Camaro L36/M49- Killed In Action

    1995 HD2500 - 4X4, NV4500 rc/lb, GL4, Turbo, exhaust

    1994 HD2500- 4X4, NV4500, ec/lb

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Apr 2001
    Location
    CA
    Posts
    13,585

    Arrow

    Quote Originally Posted by 6.5 Detroit Diesel View Post
    i read that in CA they are going to be requiring a DPF setup. Is that true? If so, I think a rebellion is in line.....
    No. When/if (I'm being optimistic) the new Diesel emissions testing begins, only originally equipped emissions components will be required. There will be no required retro-fitting. Meaning, if a truck came with DPF, it will be required. Not required if it never had one.
    1985 Blazer 6.2
    2001 GMC 2500HD D/A
    dmaxmaverick@thedieselpage.com

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    Kelowna, BC
    Posts
    1,070

    Default

    glad to hear for you guys!
    1993 HD2500- 4X4, Nv4500, rc/lb, Lots of mods, killed her. Awaiting her TT rebuild!

    2002 Camaro L36/M49- Killed In Action

    1995 HD2500 - 4X4, NV4500 rc/lb, GL4, Turbo, exhaust

    1994 HD2500- 4X4, NV4500, ec/lb

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    Michigan
    Posts
    83

    Default

    If any requirements do come into effect like that I will try to stay under the radar as long as possible. I'm really diggin the increased fuel economy and power. I feel like my rig is actually making less harmful emissions because I'm going through far less fuel per mile. Seems to me that that means I'm burning fuel more completely in the combustion chamber and not dumping excess to burn in the cat. I'm no scientist but I know I'll never put another cat or muffler on my rig. It's nowhere near as loud as my gasser suburb was with with strait pipes. I like the deep grumble better than the crackle of a gasser at high rpm. I talked my roommate into replacin the turbo on his dodge and letting me get his hx 35. Can't wait for even better fuel economy


    Will
    1996 GMC Suburban, 6.5 TD, 4L80E, 3.73 Full floating limited slip rear end, 285/75R16E Dayton Timberline ATII's.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •