Test reports can always be skewed to a particular result which is why you have blind tests, it doesn't say one way or other how the test was run, but my alarm bells are ringing loud with Stanadyne funding the test.
For a true independent test would have included multiple labs, and then the data form the different labs coalated for test findings, also the lab should not know one samples origin should be formula A, vs, B, vs, C etc. and then publish result, not saying it wasn't conducted that way but ususally blind studies are very up front with that piece of info, saying a lab is independent can be misleading, so just be cautious with info presented.
I run FPPF total power in mine that wasn't on the test list either, at 110K from 37K when I bought the tuck it works well for me, this was a Kennedy recommendation working so far.
I think bottom line is like so many subjective questions which is best? there is no definative answer you somtimes have to just go with your gut from info provided.
Recognize that fuel alone isn't condusive to long life, it's getting worse, and some sort of additive is required.
I think Doc Lee adds 2 cycle oil for lubricity, if you want to bump cetane use one that adds cetane,
FPPF Total Power adds to the 4 ones most mentioned, anti-gel, cetane, lubricity, & cleaner, does it work I think so at least in mine it does.
Power service is Tough Guy's choice works for him, so really IMO probably any will work, with exception of ones with alcohol water disbursants are only ones I've seen in various forums folks say emphatically to not use.
[ 01-28-2006, 04:50 AM: Message edited by: tbogemirep ]
Tim, 98GM K1500 6.5TD(L56/L65), Heath PCM,3.73 gear,4L80 tr,4" exh,Amz air filt&dual oil flts, Heath remote FSD, TDO-7 clone turbo, Heath fan clutch,mandrel crossover, pilar gage BST/EGT/TRN, remote elec fan tran cool,alum trn pan