Results 1 to 17 of 17

Thread: Any mileage difference running Synthetic?

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    NorthEast
    Posts
    37

    Default Any mileage difference running Synthetic?

    I have about 2500 miles on my 06 now and i'm getting ready for the first oil change. I was thinking about trying Amsoil Synthetic 10W-30/SAE 30
    Heavy Duty Diesel Oil. Will this help my mileage at all? How long will I be able to go on oil changes with only light towing.

    Thanks
    Dan
    2006 Chevy 2500 HD Ext. Cab SB, LLY w/ Alli 6 speed

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Baytown, Texas
    Posts
    34

    Default

    That specific oil is not spec'ed to meet the Duramax specifications. The Amsoil 15W40 Heavy Duty Diesel / Marine oil is the correct spec. for the Duramax.
    GMC 2005 2500HD Crew Cab, Long Bed, 4X4, Duramax<br />GMC 1991 2500HD Ext Cab, Long Bed, 7.4L, 4X4<br />Previously Owned GMC 2002 Crew Cab, Long Bed, 4X4, Duramax

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Apr 2001
    Location
    CA
    Posts
    13,583

    Arrow

    Ranch55 is correct. While the 10w-30 is CF rated, the Duramax requires a rating of CH or later. They do have an SAE-30 Heavy Duty synthetic Diesel oil, but I would not recommend it for automotive/light truck use, especially in colder climates. That oil is designed for large, heavy duty industrial/fleet equipment, like big Cat's, Cummins, Detroits, etc. If you want Amsoil, the 15-40 Heavy Duty Diesel & Marine is what you need. I have about 100K miles on my '01 with it. Amsoil did have a 5w-30 (or was it 0w-30?) Diesel rated oil, but I don't see it listed anymore.
    1985 Blazer 6.2
    2001 GMC 2500HD D/A
    dmaxmaverick@thedieselpage.com

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Mar 2000
    Location
    Greenfield, In
    Posts
    1,408

    Default

    The Series 3000 5W-30 has better shear strenght than the 15W-40. But cost is about 40% more. As for economy increase I never make that selling point because I have never seen and increase, but many have. I would not count on it though.

    Greg
    Diesel Page Supporter
    Greg Landuyt
    Lubrication Specialist, LLC.
    1-888-306 4255
    greg@lubricationspecialist.com
    http://www.lubricationspecialist.com

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Mar 2000
    Location
    bayville, new jersey, USA
    Posts
    280

    Default

    tried mobile syn in my 04 powerstroke van, and didnt see any substantial increase in mpg.....
    '12 gmc sierra 2500 dmax slt carbon black.
    '12 s350 diesel mb
    '10 mazda 6i, for sale
    '77 450sl benz, in family since new, sold, still in jersey thou
    '91 350sdl benz, 3.5l diesel, 28 mpg
    '90 560sel benz

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    RVing the USA
    Posts
    117

    Default

    This early in your truck's life, I would go to synthetic and add a bypass oil filter and do oil analysis to determine your change intervals.

    Search the forums for bypass filter threads. Install is pretty easy and you can easily double or triple your change intervals by sampling. I suspect that replacing just the OIL lost when you change filters will keep your oil additive levels 'fresh' - in any case, the sample reports will tell you when it is time to change all of the oil.

    result: better filtration AND less money!
    2003 K3500 Crew Cab, Banks Stinger Pkg, Exhaust Brake & Exhaust, OilGuard Bypass filter, Lube Specialist Secondary Fuel Filter, Allison Deep Pan, TTT Mirrors, B&W Turnover Ball and Companion Hitch, Truck Trunk Sliding Box and V-Box, LINE-X, Co-Pilot Live GPS, Hitchhiker 31.5 LKTG 5th Wheel 28' Wells-Cargo Gooseneck Car Hauler

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Location
    Feeniks, Aridzona
    Posts
    1,114

    Default

    To answer your original question, you won't see enough of a change to notice. Going 100% synthetic, front to rear (engine, trans, xfer case, rear end) may net you 1mpg.
    1987 Jeep Grand Wagoneer...new 6.5 in process...diamond block, 18:1's, other goodies...


  8. #8
    Join Date
    Nov 2000
    Location
    foxboro,ma.
    Posts
    908

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by JeepSJ
    To answer your original question, you won't see enough of a change to notice. Going 100% synthetic, front to rear (engine, trans, xfer case, rear end) may net you 1mpg.

    Been there done that..... in average temps in Newengland I dont see any benifits.... If its really cold you should see some benifits. IMHO


    My take on syn , cost more money up front and I am not the last owner of the truck...... Rotela t in my ride syn in the rear , change it more often and forget it.
    93 c-2500 6.5td,96 6.5td x cab,01 GMC lb7 Xcab ,2004 lly crew cab ,2006 lbz crew cab,honda CBR1100xx,2003 polaris prox 700 , 2001 31' holiday rambler 10K lbs house on wheels!

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Apr 2001
    Location
    CA
    Posts
    13,583

    Arrow

    Even if you aren't the "last owner", I think it's still good insurance. Using synthetic lubes WILL increase mileage and longevity. The debate is, how much? Many cases will not show an increase that can be realized by the consumer. Consumer testing isn't scientific. The increases can be more easily seen where you operate in the climate extremes. If you only operated in HI, it would very minimal, with constant temps. The sellers of synthetics offer "scientific" evidence their product increases economy, and decreases wear. Non-synthetic sellers have not, and will not, make a statement saying synthetics do not do this. If synthetics weren't superior, you can bet there'd be a company out there with a statement about it.

    Ask yourself a question. If I were looking to buy a used vehicle, and the current owner offers documentation, or a believable statement, that synthetic lubes were always used, would you consider that a valid selling point? Most would say yes, even if they don't currently use synthetics themselves.

    If you are in the camp that believes you should invest only as much in maintenance as is neccesary because you "only keep the vehicle a short while", try this...
    Use high quality synthetics throughout. Keep the records/receipts. Make a comparitive record of what the cost would have been without synthetics. When you sell, set your price, and add a "surcharge" for the added expense for the synthetics. My bet is the buyer will pay that amount, which likely won't be as much as you think now.

    Buying a used vehicle is scary business. Any assurance you can give that shows the vehicle received the highest degree of care will sell itself.
    1985 Blazer 6.2
    2001 GMC 2500HD D/A
    dmaxmaverick@thedieselpage.com

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    1,248

    Default

    DMax, I have been using the Rotella T syn. Blue jugs from Wally world all year round. Is this good? Or should I go with Rotella regular? Thanks.
    0000000

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Apr 2001
    Location
    CA
    Posts
    13,583

    Default

    You're kidding. Right?

    The "Rotella" subject is kinda' tender for some folks around here. I'll offer my opinion, though....

    Regular Rotella is good, for dino oil. Rotella T is better. However, this is where the "tender" part comes in. Rotella isn't a true synthetic oil. Period. It can be called that because a court said it could. It is altered dino oil. Nothing else. That doesn't mean it isn't a good oil. I just don't like what this backward court system in our country allows. Frivolous law suits, etc., and I consider Mobil vs. Castrol in that category.

    That being said, if you're still here, the maintenance is more important than the product you use. If you are diligent with your service, the higher quality of products you use is an added bonus. Optimally, a true synthetic would be best, but many folks feel the bite in the hip pocket. If you were to follow the synthetic lube manufacture's use directions (in most cases), the cost difference is minimal, if not less expensive in the long haul. It's just that initial cost scares most people. As far as longevity goes, I've seen the results of synthetics. In my experience, synthetic motor oil is superior, hands down. The oil doesn't break down like dino oils. It gets dirty. It can be safely used many times longer than dino oils, if it is filtered effectively. There will be a time when it becomes contaminated/diluted with other engine byproducts and needs to be changed. You can't (realistically) run it forever.

    The old "change our oil at 3000 miles" is old news. Technology has brought us past that. I ran my '85 6.2 for over 500K with changes at 10K+. I changed filters twice per service interval. My 77 Mercedes 300D ran for over 300K, before the oil pump regulator failed and killed the engine. My wife drove it for 3 weeks with no registered oil pressure before it finally kept overheating. She finally asked me when I was going to fix that broken oil pressure gauge The valves started to seize in the guides. The teardown only showed heat coloring, no galling in the cylinders or crank/bearings. The engine was overhauled, using most of the original parts, with no machining done. Still running like new, 6 years later. I replaced the head gaskets in my '85 Blazer at about 280K. All cylinders still had "factory" cross hatching and NO ridge. I replaced the original timing chain, which had no more play than the new OEM chain, with the original sprockets. Call it luck, or good lube. I credit the synthetic lube. I have no luck with anything, so I have to be good, and do it right the first time.

    My first experience with synthetic oil was in the early 80's while motorcycle racing in Washinton state. I switched to Amsoil 30w and immediately my mileage increased by more than 10%, ran cooler (air cooled 4 stroke), and was faster. Only the oil was changed, nothing else. I raced trail/enduro in the Wasington Cascade mountains in the fall/spring, and the coastal mountains in the winter. Many times, temps were around 0
    1985 Blazer 6.2
    2001 GMC 2500HD D/A
    dmaxmaverick@thedieselpage.com

  12. #12
    Join Date
    May 2002
    Location
    Georgetown, Texas
    Posts
    62

    Default

    I have been using Amsoil 15w40 since about 500 miles. I didn't notice a mileage different but when the stealer did some work on my truck a while back, they installed some dino oil and I did notice a BIG difference in cold weather starts between the two.

  13. #13
    Join Date
    Apr 2001
    Location
    CA
    Posts
    13,583

    Arrow

    A note of interest....

    I was doing some research on Shell motor oil products, and their marketing leaves some unanswered questions. They have several product lines, and use certain terms very carefully. Rotella T synthetic is called just that, synthetic. Other product lines for other applications use the term, as well. They also have a "Premium" line, and use the labeling "full synthetic", claiming the "full synthetic" is far superior to other lines, and carries a price much higher than their other synthetic labels. These products are not sold through normal chanels, but are available through select distributors on request. I've contacted them with a request for their definitions of "synthetic" and "full synthetic". Their reply should be interesting.

    More research, and I find Castrol has the same labeling in their product lines. Apparently, you get what you pay for. I've found, there is no cheap "full synthetic", in any label.

    It's all about marketing, which can be very deceptive.
    1985 Blazer 6.2
    2001 GMC 2500HD D/A
    dmaxmaverick@thedieselpage.com

  14. #14
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    Trenton, MO
    Posts
    106

    Default

    Thanks for the great info dmaxmaverick... I ran rotella syn. in my 05 when it was new and then did an analisys and the viscosity went way up at around 7k on the oil so it kind of scared me a little on rotella so I switched to mobile full syn. and have been getting along great. The rotella syn did not do that on our 02. Maybee it was because my 05 was still breaking in I don't know. One other comment on synthetic oil... we don't think much about dropping $45 to $50 when we fill up on fuel, what is the big deal about spending that every 7k or so on oil. Just a perspective that helped me out.
    Dad's truck
    02 GMC Crewcab Dually Duramax Allison 4x4
    Amsoil Ea Air Filter
    Post OEM Mega Fuel Filter;
    FilterMag on Fuel & Oil;
    Fumoto Drain Valve
    Kennedy Diesel Performance ECM
    Gauges; Kennedy Diesel Lift Pump
    Sheffenecker Mirrors

    Sold
    05 GMC Crewcab Shortbed Duramax Allison 4x4...

    Dad's truck also (My daily driver)
    2007 Classic Crew Cab 3500 Dually
    Kennedy Diesel Mega post Fuel filter
    Kennedy Diesel Lift pump & EGR blocker Package & fingers stick
    Bilstein shocks
    Amsoil synthetic oil and filters
    FilterMag on fuel and oil
    Fumoto drain valve
    Amsoil Dealer

  15. #15
    Join Date
    Jan 2001
    Location
    New Hampshire - Live Free or Die
    Posts
    6,059

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by DmaxMaverick
    Rotella isn't a true synthetic oil. Period. ... It is altered dino oil. Nothing else.
    OK, so does any one know how the end products differ? I mean, are we talking about the difference between a scratch baked cake vs. one from a mix? If they can start with dino oil and process it into the same hydrocarbon chains that "real" synthetics have, and it costs less, well, it works for me!

    BTW, in the piston aviation world, Shell's "semi-synthetics" are mixes of dino and synthetic oils.
    The Constitution needs to be re-read, not re-written!

    If you can't handle Dr. Seuss, how will you handle real life?

    Current oil burners: MB GLK250 BlueTEC, John Deere X758
    New ride: MB GLS450 - most stately
    Gone but not forgotten: '87 F350 7.3, '93 C2500 6.5, '95 K2500 6.5, '06 K2500HD 6.6, '90 MB 350SDL, Kubota 7510

  16. #16
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Location
    Feeniks, Aridzona
    Posts
    1,114

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by JohnC
    OK, so does any one know how the end products differ? I mean, are we talking about the difference between a scratch baked cake vs. one from a mix? If they can start with dino oil and process it into the same hydrocarbon chains that "real" synthetics have, and it costs less, well, it works for me!
    A "real" synthetic lubricant will not be hydrocarbon based, THAT is the difference. You cannot start with dino and process it into a "real" synthetic - you can process it into something that you can call a synthetic, but it is not really a synthetic.
    1987 Jeep Grand Wagoneer...new 6.5 in process...diamond block, 18:1's, other goodies...


  17. #17
    Join Date
    Jan 2001
    Location
    New Hampshire - Live Free or Die
    Posts
    6,059

    Default

    OK, I'll bite again. If it's not hydrocarbons, what is it?
    The Constitution needs to be re-read, not re-written!

    If you can't handle Dr. Seuss, how will you handle real life?

    Current oil burners: MB GLK250 BlueTEC, John Deere X758
    New ride: MB GLS450 - most stately
    Gone but not forgotten: '87 F350 7.3, '93 C2500 6.5, '95 K2500 6.5, '06 K2500HD 6.6, '90 MB 350SDL, Kubota 7510

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •