Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 20 of 24

Thread: smoke test

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Mar 2002
    Location
    The Netherlands
    Posts
    641

    Default smoke test

    Hi, it's been a while since my last visit couse of home inprovement issue's but I am stil alive and running the twin turbo engine.

    At the last anual check the truck failed the smoke test by 350% !!.
    Weird thing is, last year it has 1.25 K value???? some smoke messurement stuf.
    This year 5.5 and later on 4, wile 3 being the norm.
    Nothing has changed to the engine other then an 4L80E transmission to replace the TH400.

    The smoke test is revving the engine up to the governour and keep it there for 1 sec.
    The theory is to use the mass of the rotating parts for a constant load so the load is the same for every test on a particular engine.

    With the new tranny I run much lower RPM's then before so I figgured old soot comming out, but drive 200 miles in 3rd did help a little from 5.5 to 4 but that is still 3 time more then last year.

    So something else is wrong, right?

    I think my fuel lift pump is poor and low feed pressure give more advanced timing and moor smoke, had this before a few years back but that was with the stock engine and loss off power.

    Maybe someone can confirm my thoughts or have other idea's about this.
    Neeles to say that fuel and air fiters are clean, intercoolers won't make a differance when standing stil.

    Thanks, Peter
    '85 CUCV blazer 6.2 twin turbo diesel (300 HP ), 4L80E with PCS trans controller '64 F350 tow truck (restoration project)

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Nov 2001
    Location
    Aitkin, MN
    Posts
    1,986

    Default

    Good Day!

    Do you pull any kind of big trailer? Can you drive truck & trailer in / through the testing facility? I'd be tempted to go find some big hills, pull the trailer up a few of them, get 'er good & hot & cleaned out, & make sure I arrive at a time when there will be no delay in starting the test. Drop the trailer a block away if necessary; hook back up after the test.

    "The smoke test is revving the engine up to the governour and keep it there for 1 sec." If they make you hold it to the floor, I'd also consider a block of wood under the carpet right under your footfeed (accelerator pedal), where they can't see it. I'd put the block of wood in just before arriving at the testing station. I'd make the block a thickness that would barely allow rpms to get close to the governor, if that allows enough power to get in & out of the testing station. (I think I'd smack anyone that told me to do this test to my truck. )

    Merry Christmas!
    82 6.2NA K15 4X4 pickup, 4spd man w/ OD, 335K+ "In Rust We Trust" (parked)
    95 6.5TD 2500 4X4 pickup, Gear Vendors Aux. OD, > ¼ million miles - gone
    95 6.5TD 1500 4X4 3/4T Suburban, Kennedy exhaust, > ¼ million miles
    93 6.5TD 3500 4X4 1T crew cab LB pickup, 230k miles

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Location
    Feeniks, Aridzona
    Posts
    1,114

    Default

    Do they run it on a dyno in high gear, or is the trans in park/neutral when they do this? If they run it on a dyno (like they do here), then have them run it in 3rd gear.

    Can you get biodiesel in your area? I have heard that it will significantly reduce smoke compared to running straight diesel. Also, try adding a double-dose of Power Service (or whatever cetane booster you like to use).
    1987 Jeep Grand Wagoneer...new 6.5 in process...diamond block, 18:1's, other goodies...


  4. #4
    Join Date
    Mar 2002
    Location
    The Netherlands
    Posts
    641

    Default

    You're right, this is the most not proving anything test, but it seems to be some European gouvernement law and you have to let them do the test.
    Thing is that other then the hillrace ( Seen any in Holland lately ) the woodblock won't work.
    within the range off the throttle there will be more smoke than at the governor, were fuel is cut back to maintain max RPM and the turbo's will put out some boost.

    The test gave 1.5 last year and now 4 so there most be something wrong I guess.
    How about the feed pressure timing thing, any ideas?

    Peter
    '85 CUCV blazer 6.2 twin turbo diesel (300 HP ), 4L80E with PCS trans controller '64 F350 tow truck (restoration project)

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Mar 2002
    Location
    The Netherlands
    Posts
    641

    Default

    Tried a fuel additive but seems to help a little from 5.5 to 4 after the cleanout run.

    The test is stationairy, full throttle in neutral.
    Normaly most diesels pass if in reasonable condition, mine is in better shape than that so it should not be a problem.

    For the moment I stick to the timing being to advanced wich will couse more soot than normal, I'll check this weekend.

    Peter
    '85 CUCV blazer 6.2 twin turbo diesel (300 HP ), 4L80E with PCS trans controller '64 F350 tow truck (restoration project)

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Apr 2001
    Location
    CA
    Posts
    13,576

    Arrow

    "Hold my beer and watch this...."

    Tee into the vacuum line somewhere and run it straight to the wastegate actuator (or better, wire it shut if you think they won't find it). It will not allow the wastegate to open (much, unless you wire it closed) during the test, giving you the most boost (most O2) during the test. Don't drive it anywhere like this with a heavy foot, load on, or trailering, and don't do any full throttle in gear runs with it (it will overboost, and set a DTC and SES, which will fail the test). The short term WOT burst won't harm the engine while not under load. If the test results don't change, you need to find out why you are pumping in more fuel than there is O2 to burn it.
    1985 Blazer 6.2
    2001 GMC 2500HD D/A
    dmaxmaverick@thedieselpage.com

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Oct 2001
    Location
    Granby, Missouri, USA
    Posts
    3,084

    Default

    I don't think Peter's turbos have wastegates, do they? I know for sure he doesn't have an ECM or any DTC's to set and definitely no SES lights....

    I hardly have any smoke when running biodiesel, but when I switch back to #2, the black smoke comes back. So switching to bio might work, if it's available to you.

    Casey
    1995 K1500 Tahoe 2 door, 6.5LTD, 4L80E, NP241, 3.42's, 285/75R16 BFG K02's; 1997 506 block; Kennedy OPS harness, gauges, Quick Heat plugs, and TD-Max chip; Dtech FSD on FSD Cooler; vacuum pump deleted, HX35 turbo, Turbo Master, 3.5" Kennedy exhaust, F code intake; dual t/stats, HO water pump, Champion radiator; Racor fuel filter

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Mar 2002
    Location
    The Netherlands
    Posts
    641

    Wink

    Well, I do have two wastegates but since I took off the control tubes, they don't do much....
    The only computer is the transmission controller, wich will not light any lights I guess.

    Before switching to alternative fuel, I'll check the timing issue I mentioned before, funny you need more fuel to get less smoke
    '85 CUCV blazer 6.2 twin turbo diesel (300 HP ), 4L80E with PCS trans controller '64 F350 tow truck (restoration project)

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Nov 2001
    Location
    Aitkin, MN
    Posts
    1,986

    Default

    Good Day!

    In the name of keeping me reputation for stupid suggestions (see above), how's your air filter situation?

    "...funny you need more fuel to get less smoke..." Maybe someday you could explain this one to me - I've always found it to be the opposite.


    Blessings!
    (signature in previous post)

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Mar 2002
    Location
    The Netherlands
    Posts
    641

    Default

    Moondoggy,

    First the filter thing, as I stated before all the filters are clean/new, it was the first thing I looked.
    This said, I have to admit that I overlooked one, inside the electrical prime pump there is another filter wich I checked today and guess what? Full with dirty stuff.
    I replaced the filter and the feed pressure came up again and is now stable at 12 PSI.

    Now for the more fuel to get less smoke:

    If the feed pressure is far to low like 2 or 3 psi, the internal hydraulic timing divice of the injectionpump can't do it's job properly and the timing get's more advanced then normal.
    More advanced timing gives more black smoke, so that's why.
    My pump is pretty advanced as it is, so more advance and I'll get in the erea of not passing the smoke test and even the danger area of hurting the engine.
    I got to this couse the engine hardly reacted to powering the HPCA soleniod so there was hardly a pressure drop when powered.
    ( the soleniod is not used on cold starts but on a manual switch.)

    Hope this answers your question.

    I try the smoke test again tomorrow.

    Peter
    '85 CUCV blazer 6.2 twin turbo diesel (300 HP ), 4L80E with PCS trans controller '64 F350 tow truck (restoration project)

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Nov 2001
    Location
    Aitkin, MN
    Posts
    1,986

    Default

    Thanks! I'll get it some day...

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Mar 2002
    Location
    The Netherlands
    Posts
    641

    Talking Passed!!

    Moondoggy,
    nevermind if you get it or not, remember that it works.
    Passed the test today with 2.7K with 3.0 being the limit, came from 4.0 so thats what your timing does.

    Peter
    '85 CUCV blazer 6.2 twin turbo diesel (300 HP ), 4L80E with PCS trans controller '64 F350 tow truck (restoration project)

  13. #13
    Join Date
    Jun 2002
    Location
    Nederland- Schoonebeek
    Posts
    197

    Talking

    sooo.. an almost smoke-les twinturbo chevy blazer.....
    Chevy Nova sedan 1977
    6.5 HD diesel/ 4L80e
    Gear drive timing set
    Ram air, E.P.S. stainless steel exhaust
    2.73 axle ratio/ 205-65-R15 tires
    new projeckt: Dodge W200 with Detroit 6V-92

  14. #14
    Join Date
    Mar 2002
    Location
    The Netherlands
    Posts
    641

    Talking

    It still smokes a little, butt nothing a pair off good headlights can't penetrate.....
    I have the feeling it runs better to.

    Peter
    '85 CUCV blazer 6.2 twin turbo diesel (300 HP ), 4L80E with PCS trans controller '64 F350 tow truck (restoration project)

  15. #15
    Join Date
    Sep 2001
    Location
    Lubbock TX, USA
    Posts
    4,194

    Default

    How much boost does the TTD run currently under load and WOT?

    Just curious.

    I'd hate to have to pass that kind of test, full throttle in netural one some engines isn't going to be smoke less. Especially those with the 4974 injection pump or tweaked 4911 pumps.

    Glad that the test has now been passed, fuel pressure, or a lacking will cause timing issues. I'm also wondering good ways to diagnosing possible fuel return issues, increased pressures, how much restriction gets us into trouble.

    I gotta get a Fuel PSI gauge installed.
    1982 C10 SCSWB 6.5TD, mods too extensive to list. (13.69 1/4 mile @94.6 MPH) RACE TRUCK
    1982 C10 SCSWB 6.2NA, 2.73 700
    1986 C10 SCLWB 6.2TD 3.73 700
    1989 V20 SUB 6.2NA, 3.73 400
    1994 G20 VAN 6.5NA, 3.42 60E
    1994 K20LD ECSWB 6.5TD, 3.42 80E
    1995 K20 SUB 6.5TD, Wrecked, ran into by stupid teen.
    1995 C3500HD DRW 6.5TD, 12' Flatbed 5.13 80E
    1995 C3500HD DRW 6.5TD, 18' Rollback Wrecker 4.63 80E
    1994 C20HD ECLWB 6.5TD 3.73 80E Wifes Truck.
    1995 C20LD ECSWB 6.5TD 3.73 80E
    1995 K20LD SCLWB 6.5TD 3.73 80E
    1996 K30 DRW 6.5TD 4.10 80E
    1997 C10 Tahoe 2Door 2WD 5.7L to 6.5 Conversion Underway

  16. #16
    Join Date
    Jan 2001
    Location
    New Hampshire - Live Free or Die
    Posts
    6,058

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by john8662 View Post
    ... full throttle in netural one some engines isn't going to be smoke less. Especially those with the 4974 injection pump or tweaked 4911 pumps...

    Why not? It's running under no load against the governor. How much fuel is it going to be delivering?
    The Constitution needs to be re-read, not re-written!

    If you can't handle Dr. Seuss, how will you handle real life?

    Current oil burners: MB GLK250 BlueTEC, John Deere X758
    New ride: MB GLS450 - most stately
    Gone but not forgotten: '87 F350 7.3, '93 C2500 6.5, '95 K2500 6.5, '06 K2500HD 6.6, '90 MB 350SDL, Kubota 7510

  17. #17
    Join Date
    Sep 2001
    Location
    Lubbock TX, USA
    Posts
    4,194

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by JohnC View Post
    Why not? It's running under no load against the governor. How much fuel is it going to be delivering?
    I guess I'm thinking more of stabbing the throttle until it gets to the governor, flogging it. You're right that if the operator just gradually takes the throttle up to the where the engine revving at the governor, it shouldn't smoke.

  18. #18
    Join Date
    Jan 2001
    Location
    New Hampshire - Live Free or Die
    Posts
    6,058

    Default

    Right, big puff of smoke until it hits the governor.

    Don't do that!

    Besides, I'm always nervous the governor won't catch it in time...
    The Constitution needs to be re-read, not re-written!

    If you can't handle Dr. Seuss, how will you handle real life?

    Current oil burners: MB GLK250 BlueTEC, John Deere X758
    New ride: MB GLS450 - most stately
    Gone but not forgotten: '87 F350 7.3, '93 C2500 6.5, '95 K2500 6.5, '06 K2500HD 6.6, '90 MB 350SDL, Kubota 7510

  19. #19
    Join Date
    Mar 2002
    Location
    The Netherlands
    Posts
    641

    Default

    The whole idea is that the engine's own mass and the converter/flywheel is the load, they messure the from stationairy to the governor so more or less "under load".
    Point is the test equipment is not realy made for big engines, biggest thing around for passenger cars is 3.5L I hve allmost double, so the messuring chamber is not happy whem I come along

    Anyway I passed so the engine can have a rest till next year....

    I have $2 fuelpressure gauge at the filters, it was wobling up an down between 3 and 10 PSI, now it's stable at 12.

    Peter

    PS: boost at wot underload is about 18 PSI, I cant really tell, gauge stops at 15, it goes a little furter.
    '85 CUCV blazer 6.2 twin turbo diesel (300 HP ), 4L80E with PCS trans controller '64 F350 tow truck (restoration project)

  20. #20
    Join Date
    Sep 2001
    Location
    Lubbock TX, USA
    Posts
    4,194

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Peter J. Bierman View Post

    PS: boost at wot underload is about 18 PSI, I cant really tell, gauge stops at 15, it goes a little furter.
    Rock on! Same problem too, but gauge goes to 30

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •