Results 1 to 8 of 8

Thread: Suburban 6.5 1500 vs. 2500

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Posts
    126

    Default Suburban 6.5 1500 vs. 2500

    I know that the 1500 series trucks are the 1/2 ton versions and the 2500 series are the 3/4 ton series.

    My understanding is that the primary differences are the structural integrity, suspension strength, etc.; with the 2500 being the truck of choice (of the two) for towing.

    Now, when it comes to the Suburban 1500 with the 6.5 diesel, I hear that because it has the diesel that the rear end is the same as the 2500. (right?)

    Do the 1500's typically have higher gear ratio backends?

    So - besides a lighter duty suspension what else is different?

    I'm trying to figure out if I need/want a 2500 or a 1500 - I know I'm going diesel.

    If I get the 1500 could I just put some air shocks on it to improve it's handling of heavy towing jobs?

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Bangor, ME
    Posts
    135

    Default

    Suburban 1500 rear 14 bolt semi float axles retained by c-clips smaller ring gear / carrier.
    Suburban 2500 rear 14 bolt full float axles axles can be removed with wheels on the truck larger ring gear / carrier thus stronger axle.
    Bryan Lundquist
    Bangor, ME
    1998 Suburban 2500 4X4 with optimizer 6500 engine (4/07) with battery modification, remote mount FSD cooler (behind bumper), 285/75/16LRE BFG All Terrains (going to 4" backspacing wheel required 1.25" lift), AFE air cleaner, Stewart Warner Maximum Performance EGT, Boost and Trans temp gauges, 3->4" stainless exhaust, Rancho RS9000xl shocks, LEDs in all exterior lights.
    2005 2500HD crew cab 6'6"bed with 6.0L no mods yet.
    2010 2500 Suburban - couldn't wait any longer for a duramax.
    Also 1978 Chevy Blazer 350cid HD engine with Fisher plow; 1988 Suburban

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Nov 2001
    Location
    Aitkin, MN
    Posts
    1,986

    Default

    Good Day!

    Go to http://www.dieselsuburbans.com . Down near the bottom, click on "Diesel Suburban MUST READ". There's a chart near the bottom that's about the best compilation of what you want to know that I've ever seen.

    Blessings!
    82 6.2NA K15 4X4 pickup, 4spd man w/ OD, 335K+ "In Rust We Trust" (parked)
    95 6.5TD 2500 4X4 pickup, Gear Vendors Aux. OD, > ¼ million miles - gone
    95 6.5TD 1500 4X4 3/4T Suburban, Kennedy exhaust, > ¼ million miles
    93 6.5TD 3500 4X4 1T crew cab LB pickup, 230k miles

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Posts
    126

    Default

    Perfect! Thanks for the tip!

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Aug 2000
    Location
    Riverside, CA USA
    Posts
    686

    Default

    I do not have a 6.5 in either of my Suburbans, both have the 6.2's. While the 2500 is a healthier chassis, the real limiting factor with these Suburbans is the 6.2 engine. It does not have enough power to tow very much at any speed.
    83 C10 Suburban, Silverado, 6.2, 700R4, 3.73, 31-10.50R15
    82 C30 Crew Cab dually, 6.2, Banks, Th400, 4.10, Gear Vendors, 235-85R16
    83 C20 Suburban, Sierra Classic, 6.2, 700R4, 4.10, custom paint, 285-50R20
    95 Yukon, 6.5, 4L80E, 3.42, 265-50R20
    73 GMC Astro 95, 8V71, 10 speed Roadranger, 110" WB, 6 each 11R24.5

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    LI, NY
    Posts
    83

    Default

    So here is what intrigues me and makes me wonder if there is any rhyme or reason to the Suburban 1500 vs 2500 comparisons.

    I have an on the door trim labeled 2500 suburban (K). Carfax VIN check calls it a 1500. GM VIN check does not give it a label. Its GVWR is 8050lbs according to the VIN check build sheet which as I understand it makes it a 1500 supposedly and has a 3.42 G80 rear end. Note the actual sticker on the drivers door rates GVWR at 7900lbs.

    It has the F engine and heavy duty tranny cooler etc and seems to be a 2500 by all respects bar its GVWR and axle ratio.

    Does this then mean that possibly the 3.42 was a special order and that became the limiting factor with regards to the GVWR, in that had it been 3.73 or more it would have the 8600lb rating.

    As I understand it it is not a spring thing as both 1500 and 2500 have the 6 leaf spring packs.

    Hmm

    cheers
    Nobby
    97 K2500 Suburban, 3.42, 245 Tires, Custom Oil cooling lines, Snorkel Removed and 4" Heath Exhaust and Crossover. TSM Rear Disc Conversion.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Nov 2001
    Location
    Aitkin, MN
    Posts
    1,986

    Default

    Good Day!

    It's been suggested that they put the 3.42 gears in an otherwise 3/4 ton Sub & called it a 1500 to help with CAFE. I'm betting it's the 3.42 semi-floater that reduces the GVWR from 8600 (2500) to 8050 (1500), but I really have no way of knowing.

    I'm in the interesting position of having one of each (see my signature). My pickup is a full 3/4 ton 2500, my Sub is the 1500. The only difference I've found so far is the rear axle: 4.10 full-floater in the 2500 pickup, 3.42 semi-floater in the 1500 Sub.

    Blessings!
    (signature in previous post)

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    LI, NY
    Posts
    83

    Default

    Of course that figures being a 14 bolt 9.5" semi floater could lead to a GVWR reduction. So its not a case of the ratio itself but the axle. Why bother to label it as a 2500 then?

    Now here is the thing why did they not install a 3.42 with the 10.5 to keep it a true 2500?

    Or were they worried about to tall a gear for the higher weight capacity?

    cheers
    Nobby
    97 K2500 Suburban, 3.42, 245 Tires, Custom Oil cooling lines, Snorkel Removed and 4" Heath Exhaust and Crossover. TSM Rear Disc Conversion.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •