Results 1 to 4 of 4

Thread: 6.5 turbo oil drain question

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jul 2020
    Location
    Montana
    Posts
    389

    Default 6.5 turbo oil drain question

    The oil feed inlet hose is a smaller diameter and the outlet oil drain is bigger. I don’t like the design of the oil drain because it is prone to leak. I want to make my own oil drain to keep things cheap.

    Does the oil drain have to be bigger then the inlet? Is it ok to use a smaller oil drain the same size as the inlet?

    I was thinking about using a wide fuel line bent and flared on the ends with this adapter plate.


  2. #2
    Join Date
    Apr 2001
    Location
    CA
    Posts
    13,573

    Default

    Simply, NO! The inlet can be a large as you want, but the drain should always be as large as it can be, reasonably. The inlet is pressurized, but the drain relies on gravity, and MUST be as unrestricted as possible. An obstruction or reduced flow can cause leakage (into the intake) and bearing failure due to reduced heat transfer (oil coking). While the drain line and fittings may be larger than necessary, I have no evidence or data to make that determination. It is a common engineering and design practice in any hydraulic or fluid system that inlet (higher pressure, higher velocity) conduits are smaller than their outlets (lower pressure, lower velocity). You can see this in practice in many systems, including most on your own vehicles in most cases (A/C, coolant, HVAC in general, Power steering, etc.). Bends and radii can also be a factor, in how many bends and their radius, cumulatively. Friction is restriction.
    1985 Blazer 6.2
    2001 GMC 2500HD D/A
    dmaxmaverick@thedieselpage.com

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Jan 2001
    Location
    New Hampshire - Live Free or Die
    Posts
    6,057

    Default

    What he said. There is a ton of oil going through the turbo. If it can't drain out it will end up being burned. The turbo seals are not designed to hold pressure from the oil side out. On a gas engine this just makes it a mosquito fogger. On a Diesel it could cause a run-away. Back in the 70's I and a buddy decided to turbo an Austin Healey 3000. We used a 1/2" drain line. It burned about a quart every 5 miles. We upped the drain to 3/4" and all was good.

    Bottom line, you don't want any pressure in the turbo center section.
    The Constitution needs to be re-read, not re-written!

    If you can't handle Dr. Seuss, how will you handle real life?

    Current oil burners: MB GLK250 BlueTEC, John Deere X758
    New ride: MB GLS450 - most stately
    Gone but not forgotten: '87 F350 7.3, '93 C2500 6.5, '95 K2500 6.5, '06 K2500HD 6.6, '90 MB 350SDL, Kubota 7510

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Jul 2020
    Location
    Montana
    Posts
    389

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by DmaxMaverick View Post
    Simply, NO! The inlet can be a large as you want, but the drain should always be as large as it can be, reasonably. The inlet is pressurized, but the drain relies on gravity, and MUST be as unrestricted as possible. An obstruction or reduced flow can cause leakage (into the intake) and bearing failure due to reduced heat transfer (oil coking). While the drain line and fittings may be larger than necessary, I have no evidence or data to make that determination. It is a common engineering and design practice in any hydraulic or fluid system that inlet (higher pressure, higher velocity) conduits are smaller than their outlets (lower pressure, lower velocity). You can see this in practice in many systems, including most on your own vehicles in most cases (A/C, coolant, HVAC in general, Power steering, etc.). Bends and radii can also be a factor, in how many bends and their radius, cumulatively. Friction is restriction.
    Quote Originally Posted by JohnC View Post
    What he said. There is a ton of oil going through the turbo. If it can't drain out it will end up being burned. The turbo seals are not designed to hold pressure from the oil side out. On a gas engine this just makes it a mosquito fogger. On a Diesel it could cause a run-away. Back in the 70's I and a buddy decided to turbo an Austin Healey 3000. We used a 1/2" drain line. It burned about a quart every 5 miles. We upped the drain to 3/4" and all was good.

    Bottom line, you don't want any pressure in the turbo center section.
    Ok! Thank you for the quick response!

Similar Threads

  1. Turbo oil drain coupling
    By johnanc in forum 6.5L Turbo Diesel - Tech Support - Troubleshooting - Performance
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 07-21-2007, 20:57
  2. Is this the turbo drain-back?
    By TurboDiverArt in forum 6.5L Turbo Diesel - Tech Support - Troubleshooting - Performance
    Replies: 8
    Last Post: 04-17-2007, 20:51
  3. Turbo Oil Drain
    By RoverIIa in forum 6.2L/6.5L Diesel - Upgrades & Service Questions Answered
    Replies: 11
    Last Post: 09-17-2006, 18:09
  4. Turbo drain line
    By dieselcrawler in forum 6.2L Diesel - Tech Support - Troubleshooting - Performance
    Replies: 10
    Last Post: 05-25-2005, 07:00
  5. Removing turbo oil drain.
    By Randee of the Redwoods in forum 6.5L Turbo Diesel - Tech Support - Troubleshooting - Performance
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 10-04-2003, 22:49

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •