View Poll Results: LB7 Duramax local driving fuel economy (55-65 mph)

Voters
1245. You may not vote on this poll
  • less than 15 mpg (US gallons) (55-65-mph)

    97 7.79%
  • 15-16 mpg

    251 20.16%
  • 17-18 mpg

    337 27.07%
  • 19-20 or more mpg

    376 30.20%
  • Don't own an LB7 - just interested in the poll data

    184 14.78%
Results 1 to 20 of 114

Thread: 2001-early 2004 LB7 Duramax Fuel Economy Poll

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Durham, Ont. Canada
    Posts
    8

    Thumbs up

    Getting an easy 20mpg highway. Up to 23 on longer trips with '04 EC LB 4x4 SRW and the Juice with A2 set on milage(#1). Also installed a K&N air filter and modified the stock air box which helped a bit. I'll keep working on it.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Apr 2001
    Location
    CA
    Posts
    13,583

    Question

    Quote Originally Posted by DRINKDIESEL
    Getting an easy 20mpg highway. Up to 23 on longer trips with '04 EC LB 4x4 SRW and the Juice with A2 set on milage(#1). Also installed a K&N air filter and modified the stock air box which helped a bit. I'll keep working on it.
    Just curious.
    Is that mileage from the DIC, or are you calculating manually?
    1985 Blazer 6.2
    2001 GMC 2500HD D/A
    dmaxmaverick@thedieselpage.com

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Durham, Ont. Canada
    Posts
    8

    Default

    From the DIC. I was getting ~17 before the mods on the DIC.
    I'll calculate it out on the next fill up.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Apr 2001
    Location
    CA
    Posts
    13,583

    Arrow

    The reason I asked, is when using a power adder, the DIC tends to become quite optimistic. Usually, a very disapointing reality is discovered once the mileage is calculated manually. This inaccuracy is normal and consistent with the operation of the module/programmer. Problem is, the manufacturers don't disclose this in their literature. Most folks just go on thinking the mod has given them great mileage.

    Please get back to us with your results. Some folks reported the DIC mileage was still accurate with a module installed. If one can do it, they all can. There's no reason to not have the DIC calibrated, if it's possible. In either case, we should either have a calibrated DIC, or a formula to determine actual mileage from the DIC info.
    1985 Blazer 6.2
    2001 GMC 2500HD D/A
    dmaxmaverick@thedieselpage.com

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Durham, Ont. Canada
    Posts
    8

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by DmaxMaverick
    The reason I asked, is when using a power adder, the DIC tends to become quite optimistic. Usually, a very disapointing reality is discovered once the mileage is calculated manually. This inaccuracy is normal and consistent with the operation of the module/programmer. Problem is, the manufacturers don't disclose this in their literature. Most folks just go on thinking the mod has given them great mileage.

    Please get back to us with your results. Some folks reported the DIC mileage was still accurate with a module installed. If one can do it, they all can. There's no reason to not have the DIC calibrated, if it's possible. In either case, we should either have a calibrated DIC, or a formula to determine actual mileage from the DIC info.
    Gimme a couple of weeks. I'll reset the DIC at the next fill up and compare.
    You've got me worried now.
    K

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Durham, Ont. Canada
    Posts
    8

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by DmaxMaverick
    The reason I asked, is when using a power adder, the DIC tends to become quite optimistic. Usually, a very disapointing reality is discovered once the mileage is calculated manually. This inaccuracy is normal and consistent with the operation of the module/programmer. Problem is, the manufacturers don't disclose this in their literature. Most folks just go on thinking the mod has given them great mileage.

    Please get back to us with your results. Some folks reported the DIC mileage was still accurate with a module installed. If one can do it, they all can. There's no reason to not have the DIC calibrated, if it's possible. In either case, we should either have a calibrated DIC, or a formula to determine actual mileage from the DIC info.
    Sorry it took so long to get back to you. Things are hoppin' at the shop here.
    Here's the results of the DIC to actual.
    513.8 miles-crappy single lane small town type
    102.0 litres which equals 27.01 US gallons
    19.02 MPG Calculated
    19.4 MPG on DIC
    A slight difference between DIC and actual, but not much.
    I ran on level 1 (mileage) most of the time with the A2. I'll see what the DIC says when I pull my 27' 5th wheel with 5 guys and all their gear to the IHRA Canadian Nationals this weekend.
    K

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Apr 2001
    Location
    CA
    Posts
    13,583

    Arrow

    Thanks for the comeback.

    I don't consider less than 1/2 MPG outside of the normal variation, with or without mod's. If you are in fact getting accurate mileage displayed by your DIC, we need to find out why. Like I said, if it can be had by one, it can be had by all. It is interesting that some folks with the same truck and mod, get different results, in regards to the DIC.

    What other upgrades do you have on your truck? Tire size, etc.
    1985 Blazer 6.2
    2001 GMC 2500HD D/A
    dmaxmaverick@thedieselpage.com

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Jan 2001
    Location
    New Hampshire - Live Free or Die
    Posts
    6,059

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by DmaxMaverick
    Like I said, if it can be had by one, it can be had by all. It is interesting that some folks with the same truck and mod, get different results, in regards to the DIC.
    I'd expect it has to do with how far from optimal the injector flow rates are. The PCM only knows how much it is commanding, not how much is actually delivered.

    My DIC mileage is always within 1 or 2 tenths of calculated mileage. Same for fuel used.
    The Constitution needs to be re-read, not re-written!

    If you can't handle Dr. Seuss, how will you handle real life?

    Current oil burners: MB GLK250 BlueTEC, John Deere X758
    New ride: MB GLS450 - most stately
    Gone but not forgotten: '87 F350 7.3, '93 C2500 6.5, '95 K2500 6.5, '06 K2500HD 6.6, '90 MB 350SDL, Kubota 7510

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •