Results 1 to 14 of 14

Thread: 6.2/6.5 Dyno Data

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    Kelowna, BC
    Posts
    1,070

    Default Dyno Run

    I looked for, but couldn't find the post that had been set up for posting dyno
    runs and numbers.
    A local shop with a mustang dyno was offering tests for $50 so I pulled in. Took a little to get set up. The first pull, the tech just opened the door, didn't turn on the fans. And the room got rather black. After that he turned on the fans.
    Did 3 pulls, the 3rd one, the optical sensor stopped reading above 3,300 rpm. So only got the first two verified.
    I am running the 36" Mudders again, and they didn't have an entry for a 6.5 in their computer, so the tech matched it up as close as he could.
    First run pulled 163 Hp, 361 tq.
    Changed a few things and did second run.
    Netted 191 HP at 3,000 rpm and 376 tq at 2,100 rpm.
    I felt these were decent numbers for the truck, so far.
    Also am going back to pick up an almost new Cummins intercooler for $100.
    1993 HD2500- 4X4, Nv4500, rc/lb, Lots of mods, killed her. Awaiting her TT rebuild!

    2002 Camaro L36/M49- Killed In Action

    1995 HD2500 - 4X4, NV4500 rc/lb, GL4, Turbo, exhaust

    1994 HD2500- 4X4, NV4500, ec/lb

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Feb 2000
    Location
    Montana
    Posts
    11,413

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by 6.5 Detroit Diesel View Post
    I looked for, but couldn't find the post that had been set up for posting dyno
    runs and numbers.
    A local shop with a mustang dyno was offering tests for $50 so I pulled in. Took a little to get set up. The first pull, the tech just opened the door, didn't turn on the fans. And the room got rather black. After that he turned on the fans.
    Did 3 pulls, the 3rd one, the optical sensor stopped reading above 3,300 rpm. So only got the first two verified.
    I am running the 36" Mudders again, and they didn't have an entry for a 6.5 in their computer, so the tech matched it up as close as he could.
    First run pulled 163 Hp, 361 tq.
    Changed a few things and did second run.
    Netted 191 HP at 3,000 rpm and 376 tq at 2,100 rpm.
    I felt these were decent numbers for the truck, so far.
    Also am going back to pick up an almost new Cummins intercooler for $100.
    Those sound like good numbers for the 6.5. Three pulls is a good number. The engine warms up for each successive pull, and the numbers can increase a little with each one - to a point.

    Thanks for posting.

    Jim
    Last edited by More Power; 04-13-2009 at 13:16. Reason: update

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    Kelowna, BC
    Posts
    1,070

    Default

    If you want to sure. That's probably where it belongs anyways.
    1993 HD2500- 4X4, Nv4500, rc/lb, Lots of mods, killed her. Awaiting her TT rebuild!

    2002 Camaro L36/M49- Killed In Action

    1995 HD2500 - 4X4, NV4500 rc/lb, GL4, Turbo, exhaust

    1994 HD2500- 4X4, NV4500, ec/lb

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Calgary AB. Canada EH!
    Posts
    380

    Wink Good numbers?

    If a stock 6.5 dyno's around 150 - 160 h.p. shouldn't a truck that has high boost, upgraded exhaust, marine injectors and IP turned up put out more than 31 - 41 more HP? These numbers sound low to me. I was thinking more along the line of 225 Hp / 440 ft lb tq. Maybe the old girl is getting a little tired. 6.5 DD when I get out your way I'll have to race you.
    93 2500 - best truck I ever owned
    Sold

    98 GMC Sierra 1/2 ton 4X4 EC SB Dark Blue
    3"turbo down to 4" back.
    Remote PMD
    Was S then F code now SSD ECM (used - it was cheap - not my first choice)

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    Kelowna, BC
    Posts
    1,070

    Default

    Ya, I think it should have made more power to. But, I am starting to doubt whether I actually have a higher pop injector in the truck.
    That, and the tech said the 36's soak up power nicely. And judging by seat of the pants feeling when I switched to them, he's right. I picked up a cummins intercooler while i was down there, so that is going to be getting hooked up soon.
    1993 HD2500- 4X4, Nv4500, rc/lb, Lots of mods, killed her. Awaiting her TT rebuild!

    2002 Camaro L36/M49- Killed In Action

    1995 HD2500 - 4X4, NV4500 rc/lb, GL4, Turbo, exhaust

    1994 HD2500- 4X4, NV4500, ec/lb

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Calgary AB. Canada EH!
    Posts
    380

    Default

    If you come across another cummings intercooler please let me know. I was going for the DYI but I like the placement of the Cummings cooler behind the grill better. Those 36's really must turn your gear ratio's up.
    93 2500 - best truck I ever owned
    Sold

    98 GMC Sierra 1/2 ton 4X4 EC SB Dark Blue
    3"turbo down to 4" back.
    Remote PMD
    Was S then F code now SSD ECM (used - it was cheap - not my first choice)

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    Kelowna, BC
    Posts
    1,070

    Default

    Dave PM me. They have one more sitting at the shop. I picked mine up for $112 with tax
    As for the tires, I took them off this morning. What a difference in power. I don't even want to think what running them with something lower than 4.10's would be like.
    1993 HD2500- 4X4, Nv4500, rc/lb, Lots of mods, killed her. Awaiting her TT rebuild!

    2002 Camaro L36/M49- Killed In Action

    1995 HD2500 - 4X4, NV4500 rc/lb, GL4, Turbo, exhaust

    1994 HD2500- 4X4, NV4500, ec/lb

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Location
    Martinsville, IN
    Posts
    3,163

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by DaveBr View Post
    If a stock 6.5 dyno's around 150 - 160 h.p. shouldn't a truck that has high boost, upgraded exhaust, marine injectors and IP turned up put out more than 31 - 41 more HP? These numbers sound low to me. I was thinking more along the line of 225 Hp / 440 ft lb tq. Maybe the old girl is getting a little tired. 6.5 DD when I get out your way I'll have to race you.
    It takes a lot of work to get to those numbers, which is where I was in 2004 with my truck. See the dyno data here. Plus, the 6.5 doesn't last very long there without doing work inside. Cracked piston and cracked main web followed.

    I don't have new numbers yet, but the Pull-Off performance suggests that I am significantly higher now. With durability, too.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    Kelowna, BC
    Posts
    1,070

    Default

    ronniejoe, any idea of when you are going to be doing some pulls with your 6.5?
    1993 HD2500- 4X4, Nv4500, rc/lb, Lots of mods, killed her. Awaiting her TT rebuild!

    2002 Camaro L36/M49- Killed In Action

    1995 HD2500 - 4X4, NV4500 rc/lb, GL4, Turbo, exhaust

    1994 HD2500- 4X4, NV4500, ec/lb

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Location
    Martinsville, IN
    Posts
    3,163

    Default

    Hopefully, maybe, this summer.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •