Results 1 to 7 of 7

Thread: Puzzling problem with Mercedes OM651

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jan 2001
    Location
    New Hampshire - Live Free or Die
    Posts
    6,164

    Default Puzzling problem with Mercedes OM651

    I have a Mercedes GLK250 with the OM651 engine. I'm getting a code for excessive EGR flow and it sets at idle or during decel. We've tried a number of things, and the only fault left is a slight leak around a shaft in the EGR cooler bypass valve when smoke testing the intake. (Red arrow in photo.) I'm wondering if the manifold is under vacuum under those conditions and it could be drawing in air where we see the smoke. (It's a very small amount of smoke.)

    Is there something we could spray on the area of the leak to see if it's being drawn into the engine? I was thinking propane? It would be easy of it were a gas engine...
    Attached Images Attached Images
    The Constitution needs to be re-read, not re-written!

    If you can't handle Dr. Seuss, how will you handle real life?

    Current oil burners: MB GLK250 BlueTEC, John Deere X758
    New ride: MB GLS450 - most stately
    Gone but not forgotten: '87 F350 7.3, '93 C2500 6.5, '95 K2500 6.5, '06 K2500HD 6.6, '90 MB 350SDL, Kubota 7510

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jan 2001
    Location
    Knoxville,Tennessee
    Posts
    2,811

    Default

    Maybe a short shot of starting fluid. Who's going to ride the fender to check under deceleration?
    "The Constitution is not an instrument for the government to restrain the people, it is an instrument for the people to restrain the government."
    -Patrick Henry


    A5150nut
    2006 K3500 D/A
    94 6.5 4x4 5spd Sold

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Apr 2001
    Location
    CA
    Posts
    13,777

    Default

    Propane or butane. Starting fluid/ether can pool then ignite explosively, especially on a hot engine, and may also trigger the knock sensor, if it has one. If you're seeing smoke there, no telling how much excess air/gas it's sucking in operation. I believe the intake is throttled, and should have strong vacuum at idle and decel, although the intake vacuum should be less restricted during decel. In any case, the incidence of the most leaked-in air would be at idle or deceleration.

    In all likelihood, if the cooler valve is leaking at the shaft, you can't repair it (looking at the pic). You can pack it with silicone grease or PTFE paste, which may slow it enough to get under the sensor range. A shaft leak may be minimal or insignificant, and an internal leak is a much more common point of failure. Probably not an inexpensive repair, if it can't be "cleaned" or bandaged. I doubt you'd get a code for excessive EGR flow if fresh air is leaking in. More likely a MAF sensor error. EGR gas is exhaust gas, containing much higher levels of CO/CO2, which hinders/cools combustion.
    1985 Blazer 6.2
    2001 GMC 2500HD D/A
    dmaxmaverick@thedieselpage.com

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Jan 2001
    Location
    New Hampshire - Live Free or Die
    Posts
    6,164

    Default

    I need EGR almost as much as I need that stupid throttle plate! The EGR cooler and the plastic intake manifold were all clogged up with carbon.

    The valve doesn't appear to be repairable. It's all swaged together. However, it's easily fixed by applying $400 directly to the problem.

    Quote Originally Posted by a5150nut View Post
    Who's going to ride the fender to check under deceleration?
    I think we'll try it at idle first.
    The Constitution needs to be re-read, not re-written!

    If you can't handle Dr. Seuss, how will you handle real life?

    Current oil burners: MB GLK250 BlueTEC, John Deere X758
    New ride: MB GLS450 - most stately
    Gone but not forgotten: '87 F350 7.3, '93 C2500 6.5, '95 K2500 6.5, '06 K2500HD 6.6, '90 MB 350SDL, Kubota 7510

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Apr 2001
    Location
    CA
    Posts
    13,777

    Default

    It was hashed out decades ago: EGR is a ecological and economical net loss. From the adaptation and control engineering, materials, component manufacture process, combustion efficiency (fuel economy) loss, to repair, disposal/recycle, it never returned a positive. We will find the same for DPF and DEF, in the end. "Rolling Coal" is a thing of the past, save a few ignorants, probably compensating for something. Almost no one is opposed to clean(er) air, but simply throwing money at a problem for short-term feelgoods isn't a solution for anything. If it's any consolation, California thanks you for your contribution to this boondoggle.
    1985 Blazer 6.2
    2001 GMC 2500HD D/A
    dmaxmaverick@thedieselpage.com

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Jan 2001
    Location
    New Hampshire - Live Free or Die
    Posts
    6,164

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by DmaxMaverick View Post
    If it's any consolation, California thanks you for your contribution to this boondoggle.
    Had I known that would happen I probably would have bought something different.
    The Constitution needs to be re-read, not re-written!

    If you can't handle Dr. Seuss, how will you handle real life?

    Current oil burners: MB GLK250 BlueTEC, John Deere X758
    New ride: MB GLS450 - most stately
    Gone but not forgotten: '87 F350 7.3, '93 C2500 6.5, '95 K2500 6.5, '06 K2500HD 6.6, '90 MB 350SDL, Kubota 7510

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Apr 2001
    Location
    CA
    Posts
    13,777

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by JohnC View Post
    Had I known that would happen I probably would have bought something different.
    You mean like something 1960's or earlier? The problem is the mandates and the nature of the concept. We still don't have the technology to do it right at an acceptable expense, but the political mandates require us to use what we have, despite the efficacy. Every vehicle model with smog equipment will have failures. Some more than others, some less than others, but no model is immune. A $400 repair cost isn't surprising, at all. If you want to keep a vehicle a long time, replace expensive parts with long/lifetime warranties, and don't lose the receipts.
    1985 Blazer 6.2
    2001 GMC 2500HD D/A
    dmaxmaverick@thedieselpage.com

Similar Threads

  1. which truck for a mercedes swap?
    By samara21 in forum Diesel Conversions & Swaps
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 07-10-2008, 12:22
  2. Chrysler to sell Mercedes "Freightliner" diesel va.
    By hoot in forum General Diesel
    Replies: 10
    Last Post: 02-08-2002, 10:21
  3. Turbo conversion for NA Mercedes
    By jrlii in forum General Diesel
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 11-02-2001, 02:11

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •